Hello George! You got secondary testing equipment! To the resistance for the current limitation: because one is marked: hihi: you're confusing me with kilovolt. Kilovolt had problems with missing resistor, not me. I know that you must use usually a resistor. But my source of the crank has a very weak current, he manages without series resistor and even without discharge protection resistor.
As I can see from the drawing still capacitors or Leydener parallel to the output gap bottles to increase the discharge. There is of course needed a protection resistor.
Whether that is so in my case, I need to try out yet. Then Leydener show me a bottle that keeps out good 300kV: hihi: ne... The symbol P is only the capacity of the anode to Earth there. I don't know why you need it. Rd is probably the air resistance and the resistance of the discharge (?) probably re. How do you know that it is the anode? ;) (because the arrow UL?)
Apart from the fact that capacity is located in series to the main spark gap. Turning mostly parallel to a Peakingkondensator. So how are the caps they have absolutely no benefit in my opinion. Generally, the drawing is somehow pretty weird. Resistors at the spark gaps? Even if this circuit is used purely for simulation purposes the capacities on the FS and the resistors on the caps I'd personally get important quite apart from the fact, that you would have to draw more inductors instead of ohmic resistors and jo said the discharge capacity should be parallel to the main spark gap and not in series to do so.
I have dealt with Marx generators for very short unloading times (high pulse rates and short pulse rising edge) and for me this shown plan simply makes no sense. : Garcia:
When my Marx (intended for short pulses) that looks somewhat different time apart from the fact that here the main spark line replaced by the laser tube and the pulse compression (and thus the Peakingkapazität is loaded not prematurely) employed an additional spark gap and a different structure of the actual Marx generator was chosen in the plan. The resistors on the spark gaps represent only the air resistance. in my opinion I that a test circuit for insulators, "Leyden bottle" is only an insulator with parasitic capacity. I have not even thought of, but it sounds irwie am logischstem (have I that spelled correctly?). Yesterday, a diode line hit by me. I didn't think that my weak crank generator. Got it repaired and fitted with a larger protective resistor. Now we go back.
I have got a second protection testing manufacturing: A Villard circuit with diode and capacitor chains. Because you realize but huge crank's performance is how tenuous. The voltage power weaker, although the voltage is considered mathematically higher after 6 steps should be.
It enough for me but as a functional model: D.
